U.S. Soccer lost to England at Wembley Stadium in London on Wednesday, 2-0. Not unexepected–England, despite their recent troubles, have some very good players. It was the way the U.S. team played and lost, though, that’s most troubling. We had very little possession, almost no creativity, and didn’t look like scoring on anything other than a lucky bounce.
This is not where we’re supposed to be.
Years ago, U.S. Soccer announced a plan (with Nike as a sponsor) called Project 2010. It included money, guaranteed pro development contracts for younger players, and more money. It was so named because the goal was to have our team capable of competing for a World Cup Trophy by 2010. Well, it doesn’t look good.
Everything about this last game was bad. Start with player selection: Coach Bob Bradley left a handful of in-form MLS players at home, instead relying heavily on the European-based guys. The problem here is that many of our Euro guys either aren’t playing for the club teams or are playing in leagues inferior to MLS. We may have the depth to take a B-side into, say, Jamaica, and look OK but… Read the rest of this entry ?







U.S. Soccer has announced the home venues for the second round of World Cup qualifying this fall. This, of course, provided our boys can take care of Barbados next month as expected. It all adds up to a busy stretch of sports, sports, sports later this year.